Citric Acid Cycle
True or False
The citric acid cycle is reduces carbons
False.
So what does it reduce?
$NAD^{+} + H^{-} \rightarrow NADH$ and $Q + H^{+} + H^{-} \rightarrow QH_{2}$
Which allows cells to extract more energy, glycolysis or the citric acid cycle?
The citric acid cycle (yields ~30 ATP/glucose relative to 2 for glycolysis)
Why is its yield so much higher?
It fully oxidizes glucose to $CO_{2}$
Citric acid cyle summary
A "roundabout" is a good mental picture of the citric acid cycle
The citric acid cycle acts as a "buffer" for all metabolism
Citric acid cycle is central to all metabolism
Key points
IMPORTANT: Do not worry about (or get lost in) details that follow. Focus on the key points and how these examples illustrate these points.
Most of our energy comes from three forms of fuel
Most of our energy comes from three forms of fuel
Sugar
Most of our energy comes from three forms of fuel
Fat is broken into a glycerol molecule and its acyl chains
Glycerol is converted to dihydroxyacetone phosphate
Sound familiar? It's a glycolysis intermediate
Acyl chains are "activated" using conezyme A
Coenzyme A (coA) acts as a "handle" for cells to move around actetate in both catabolism and anabolism
2 carbon units are sequentially chopped off
Is the conversion of an acyl chain to acetyl-coA an oxidation or reduction?
Oxidation.
So what other reaction might be coupled to this one?
Each round generates 1 $QH_{2}$ and 1 $NADH$
Fatty acid oxidation produces an acetyl-coA molecule for every two carbons in the acyl chain
What happens to the acetyl-coA?
It enters the citric acid cycle (where it yields 3 $NADH$, 1 $QH_{2}$ and 1 $GTP$)
Fats store a lot of energy
"Typical" triglyceride will have 3 acyl chains of 16 carbons
If you add up reduced $NADH$ and friends you get $\frac {13 \ ATP}{2 \ carbons}$
Total yield is $3 \ chains \times \frac{16\ carbons}{chain} \times \frac{13\ ATP}{2 \ carbons}$
$3 \times 16 \times 13/2 = 312 \ ATP$
Fats have higher $ATP$ yield per carbon than glucose
Fat: $312/48 = 6.5 ATP \cdot carbon^{-1}$
Glucose: $32/6 = 5.3 ATP \cdot carbon^{-1}$
Why is this the case?
Glucose is already oxidized relative to an acyl chain
Gram per gram, fat has twice as much stored energy as sugar
Fats can be synthesized starting from acetyl-coA, just like glucose can be synthesized from pyruvate by gluconeogenesis
Do you think this is a simple reversal of $\beta$-oxidation? Why or why not?
No. Just like gluconeogenesis, irreversible steps must be bypassed.
Big idea:
There are lots of steps in fatty acid oxidation, but those steps all work to convert the material into the same bits that we saw sugar become ($DHAP$, $acetyl-coA$, $NADH$, $QH_{2}$)
Most of our energy comes from three forms of fuel
How do you think cells deal with the complex structure and chemistry of proteins?
They unfold the protein and chop it up into amino acids with proteases
Free amino acids can be directly recycled to make more proteins
They can also be used for fuel or to make other biomolecules
Many amino acids can be directly converted to things like pyruvate or acetyl-coA
Nitrogens get passed around a lot via transamination
$\alpha$-ketoglutarate can be combined with glutamine to make 2 glutamates
Recognize $\alpha$-ketoglutarate? Citric acid cycle intermediate
Glutamate and pyruvate can be converted to $\alpha$-ketoglutarate and alanine
Amino acid catabolism is intimately tied into the citric acid cycle
Amino acids are made by many inter-conversions between amino acids and other metabolites...in their own metabolic cycles
Key point: a dizzying array of molecules are made and processed in cells, but are tied together through several key metabolites.
Summary